U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX611299: GSM1416460: NIW_0_MPI_3; Vitis vinifera; RNA-Seq
2 ILLUMINA (Illumina HiSeq 2500) runs: 22.8M spots, 1.1G bases, 728.1Mb downloads

Submitted by: Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)
Study: Host-based markers for the early stage of infection by the grapevine trunk pathogen Neofusicoccum parvum
show Abstracthide Abstract
In the vineyard, symptoms of the grapevine trunk disease Botryosphaeria dieback do not appear until 1 or 2 years after the causal fungus Neofusicoccum parvum establishes a necrotic canker in the permanent woody structure of the vine. There are preventative management practices, but growers tend to wait until symptoms are widespread, at which point prevention has limited efficacy. Toward development of an early detection tool, we examined the leaves of inoculated vs. non-inoculated plants for differential gene expression via RNASeq. Stems were examined to monitor spread of the infection, and its spatial and temporal relationship to anatomical changes via light microscopy and high resolution computed tomography (HRCT). The early stage of infection occurred prior to 2 months post-inoculation (MPI), at which point spread of the pathogen beyond the inoculation site was greatest. This incubation period was also characterized by the largest stem lesions, the highest levels of fungal colonization and xylem vessels fully-occluded by gels, and the lowest starch content of xylem fibers and rays. Prior to 2 MPI, RNASeq and validative qPCR analysis identified eight candidate markers, which are transcriptionally activated by infection, but not by wounding alone. Our best marker genes, a dehydrin, a BURP domain containing protein and an abscissic acid-induced wheat plasma membrane polypeptide 19 (AWPM-19), identified the pathogen’s presence with high specificity. Screening of genome-wide expression data revealed that this signature is not affected by many abiotic and biotic stresses. Overall design: Asymptomatic leaf mRNA profiles of Neofusicoccum parvum infected wounded plants (IW) and non-infected wounded plants (NIW) at two different time points post inoculation (0 MPI, 0.5-1.5 MPI) were generated by deep sequencing in biological triplicates using Illumina HiSeq2500 technology.
Sample: NIW_0_MPI_3
SAMN02867467 • SRS642274 • All experiments • All runs
Organism: Vitis vinifera
Library:
Instrument: Illumina HiSeq 2500
Strategy: RNA-Seq
Source: TRANSCRIPTOMIC
Selection: cDNA
Layout: SINGLE
Construction protocol: For each RNA extraction, frozen leaves from three plants were mixed and grinded to a fine powder using mortar and pistil under liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was isolated using a rapid cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-based extraction method with minor modifications (Gambino et al., 2008). DNA was removed by RNase-Free DNase (Qiagen) digestion in solution and then purified using RNAeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Primers for leucoanthocyanidin reductase 1 gene were used to check all RNA preparations for genomic DNA contamination (Bogs et al., 2005). RNA quality was analyzed using Experion RNA StdSens Chips (BioRad) to verify intact ribosomal bands [rRNA ratio (25s/18s) = 1.8-2.0] and RNA Quality Indicator (RQI) values > 8. For 0 MPI samples, 2 ug of the extracted total RNA was used to make the library. For the mixed second time point (0.5-1.5 MPI) 0.66 ug of extracted RNA from 0.5 MPI, 1 MPI and 1.5 MPI were mixed to give a total of 2ug RNA which was used to make the library. RNA extraction and library preparation was performed on biological triplicates for each of the four treatment time combination (IW 0 MPI, IW 0.5-1.5 MPI, NIW 0 MPI, NIW 0.5-1.5 MPI) to give a total of 12 libraries for RNA-Seq. RNA libraries for sequencing were prepared from 2ug of total RNA using a modified version of the Illumina TruSeq RNA Library Prep Protocol which is accessible at the website of the DNA Technologie Core, UC Davis (http://dnatech.genomecenter.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/TruSeq_RNA_Sample_Prep_Sept2012.pdf). TruSeq Adapter used were AGTCAA (TruSeq Adapter, Index 13) for IW_0_MPI_1, AGTTCC (TruSeq Adapter, Index 14) for IW_0_MPI_2, ATGTCA (TruSeq Adapter, Index 15) for IW_0_MPI_3, CCGTCC (TruSeq Adapter, Index 16) for IW_0.5-1.5_MPI_1, GTCCGC (TruSeq Adapter, Index 18) for IW_0.5-1.5_MPI_2, GTGAAA (TruSeq Adapter, Index 19) for IW_0.5-1.5_MPI_3, GTGGCC (TruSeq Adapter, Index 20) for NIW_0_MPI_1, GTTTCG (TruSeq Adapter, Index 21) for NIW_0_MPI_2, CGTACG (TruSeq Adapter, Index 22) for NIW_0_MPI_3, GAGTGG (TruSeq Adapter, Index 23) for NIW_0.5-1.5_MPI_1, ACTGAT (TruSeq Adapter, Index 25) for NIW_0.5-1.5_MPI_2, ATTCCT (TruSeq Adapter, Index 27) for NIW_0.5-1.5_MPI_3. The 12 libraries were pooled, sequenced on two lanes of the same flow cell of a HiSeq2500 and de-multiplexed to produce 24 raw fastq files. TruSeq Adapter Index sequences are incorporated in the names of the raw fastq files.
Experiment attributes:
GEO Accession: GSM1416460
Links:
External link:
Runs: 2 runs, 22.8M spots, 1.1G bases, 728.1Mb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR142585311,372,126568.6M362.4Mb2015-03-24
SRR142585411,447,195572.4M365.7Mb2015-03-24

ID:
859584

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...